Given a set of points of diameter in
dimensional Euclidean space
it is trivial to see that it can be covered by a ball of radius
. But the following theorem by Jung improves the result by a factor of about
, and is the best possible.
Theorem 1 [ Jung's Theorem: ] Let be a set of points in
of diameter
. Then there is a ball of radius
covering
.
Proof: We first prove this theorem for sets of points with
and then extend it to an arbitrary point set. If
then the smallest ball enclosing
exists. We assume that its center is the origin. Denote its radius by
. Denote by
the subset of points such that
for
. It is easy to see that
is in fact non empty.
Observation: The origin must lie in the convex hull of . Assuming the contrary, there is a separating hyperplane
such that
lies on one side and the origin lies on the other side of
(strictly). By assumption, every point in
is distance strictly less than
from the origin. Move the center of the ball slightly from the origin, in a direction perpendicular to the hyperplane
towards
such that the distances from the origin to every point in
remains less than
. However, now the distance to every point of
is decreased and so we will have a ball of radius strictly less than
enclosing
which is a contradiction to the minimality of
.
Let where
and because the origin is in the convex hull of
so we have nonnegative
such that,
Fix a . Then we have,
Adding up the above inequalities for all values of , we get
Thus we get since
and the function
is monotonic. So we have immediately
.
The remainder of the proof uses the beautiful theorem of Helly. So assume is any set of points of diameter
. With each point as center draw a ball of radius
. Clearly any
of these balls intersect. This is true because the center of the smallest ball enclosing
of the points is at most
away from each of those points. So we have a collection of compact convex sets, any
of which have a nonempty intersection. By Helly’s theorem all of them have an intersection. Any point of this intersection can be chosen to be the center of a ball of radius
that will enclose all of
.
this proof is missing a small step: (m-1)/2m <= n/(2n+2) since the function (x-1)/2x is monotonic.
Thanks. Step added! (cstheory)